No Result
View All Result
Success American Investors
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Success American Investors
No Result
View All Result
Home Investing

James Dyson condemns ‘spiteful’ inheritance tax in budget, warns of impact on family businesses

by
November 4, 2024
in Investing
0
James Dyson condemns ‘spiteful’ inheritance tax in budget, warns of impact on family businesses
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Sir James Dyson has strongly criticised Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ latest Budget, describing the new inheritance tax policy as a “spiteful” move that threatens the future of family businesses in the UK.

Under the changes, family-owned businesses and farms worth over £1 million will face a 20 per cent inheritance tax starting in April 2026, a measure Dyson argues could lead to the “death of entrepreneurship” and dismantle the foundation of the British economy.

Writing in The Times, Dyson accused Reeves of “killing off established family businesses” with the so-called “Family Death Tax,” cautioning that this policy undermines long-term business continuity and discourages new ventures. “No business can survive Reeves’s 20 per cent tax grab,” he argued, highlighting the risk of job losses in a sector that, he says, traditionally values stability and generational commitment.

In defence of the Budget, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper rejected Dyson’s remarks, asserting that the measures were necessary to address “the shocking state of public finances.” Cooper stated that the tax changes were part of a strategy to “fix the foundations” of the economy and fund critical public services, including the NHS. She emphasised that, while the policy involved difficult decisions, it was essential for building a stronger financial foundation.

The inheritance tax changes come amid a broader £40 billion tax increase aimed at supporting the NHS and other public services. However, critics argue that the tax on family farms, expected to raise £520 million annually, would cover less than a day’s NHS spending. National Farmers Union president Tom Bradshaw warned of a mental health crisis among farmers, with many expressing concern that the tax could force them to sell or significantly alter their businesses.

Rachel Reeves defended the inheritance tax changes on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, stating that agricultural property relief primarily benefited “the wealthiest landowners” and was no longer sustainable given current fiscal pressures. She argued that redirecting funds from these reliefs into public services would ultimately benefit all, including rural communities.

As rural voters and family businesses react to the policy, Labour faces pressure to balance tax reform with the unique needs of these sectors, particularly ahead of local elections in May.

Read more:
James Dyson condemns ‘spiteful’ inheritance tax in budget, warns of impact on family businesses

Previous Post

Markets Made of Glass—How the Fed Destroyed Economic Resilience

Next Post

Deregulation, Not Rent Control, Is the Right Response to the Housing Crisis

Next Post
Deregulation, Not Rent Control, Is the Right Response to the Housing Crisis

Deregulation, Not Rent Control, Is the Right Response to the Housing Crisis

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Vertica: The new Israeli start-up challenger to Viagra proving ‘life-changing’ for men with ED

Vertica: The new Israeli start-up challenger to Viagra proving ‘life-changing’ for men with ED

February 14, 2024

Last Day to Give in 2023!

December 31, 2023
Idaho Bucks Managed Care Trend

Idaho Bucks Managed Care Trend

December 5, 2023

The Producer Price Index

September 9, 2023
Legal Brief: Even in Emergencies, the President Cannot Seize Congress’s Tariff Powers

Legal Brief: Even in Emergencies, the President Cannot Seize Congress’s Tariff Powers

0

0

0

0
Legal Brief: Even in Emergencies, the President Cannot Seize Congress’s Tariff Powers

Legal Brief: Even in Emergencies, the President Cannot Seize Congress’s Tariff Powers

July 9, 2025

Ovacome, UK’s Leading Ovarian Cancer Support Charity, Plans Visit to Wales

July 9, 2025

The Texas Floods: Another Disaster, Another False Narrative

July 9, 2025

The Texas Floods and Political Opportunism

July 9, 2025

Recent News

Legal Brief: Even in Emergencies, the President Cannot Seize Congress’s Tariff Powers

Legal Brief: Even in Emergencies, the President Cannot Seize Congress’s Tariff Powers

July 9, 2025

Ovacome, UK’s Leading Ovarian Cancer Support Charity, Plans Visit to Wales

July 9, 2025

The Texas Floods: Another Disaster, Another False Narrative

July 9, 2025

The Texas Floods and Political Opportunism

July 9, 2025

Disclaimer: SuccessAmericanInvestors.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 SuccessAmericanInvestors. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock

Copyright © 2025 SuccessAmericanInvestors. All Rights Reserved.