No Result
View All Result
Success American Investors
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Success American Investors
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Federal Versus State Policies

by
May 22, 2025
in Editor's Pick
0
Federal Versus State Policies
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Jeffrey Miron

What level of government—state or federal—should set economic and social policy?

The modern presumption is that “good” policies should be implemented federally. That is the logic behind the federal role in setting a minimum wage, providing Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, imposing nationwide environmental regulations, and much more. If something “works,” so the thinking goes, why not apply it everywhere?

Yet there are reasons to prefer state-level control (if any), even if that sometimes produces less-than-ideal outcomes.

For starters, most policies involve a mix of positive and negative effects. And people differ on not only what is “good” but how to balance costs and benefits. A federal mandate forces national uniformity on divisive issues, such as abortion or school curricula. Letting states choose leaves room for calmer disagreement and lower polarization.

Further, government policies and programs tend to grow, especially those at the federal level, but state variation serves as a check. Critics worry about a “race to the bottom,” where states gut regulation to attract business or skimp on redistribution to avoid being a “welfare magnet.” But this tendency, to the extent it occurs, is a useful counterweight to the excessive expansion that is likely to occur when policies are made at the federal level. Plus, in practice, states often go beyond federal standards: Think of California’s aggressive emissions rules or Massachusetts’ expansion of Medicaid before the Affordable Care Act.

To be sure, state-level control has downsides. Some states may do too little—for example, they might underinvest in public health. And state-level variation means national companies face a patchwork of laws and regulations, which raises costs.

But these negatives are plausibly worth accepting to avoid one-size-fits-all federal policies. In particular, federalism likely works best when applied consistently across all policies, whether politically left or right.

This article appeared on Substack on May 22, 2025. Lucy Patalano, a student at Wellesley College, cowrote this post.

Previous Post

Over 38,700 emergency food parcels distributed in Bristol and South Gloucestershire amidst ongoing high demand

Next Post

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

Next Post
SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Vertica: The new Israeli start-up challenger to Viagra proving ‘life-changing’ for men with ED

Vertica: The new Israeli start-up challenger to Viagra proving ‘life-changing’ for men with ED

February 14, 2024
Idaho Bucks Managed Care Trend

Idaho Bucks Managed Care Trend

December 5, 2023

Last Day to Give in 2023!

December 31, 2023

The Producer Price Index

September 9, 2023

Regime Uncertainty and the Trump New Deal

0

0

0

0

Regime Uncertainty and the Trump New Deal

May 22, 2025

“Certified Software from Cognigy Empowers Azure Customers as Microsoft Solutions Partner, Introducing Agentic Enterprise AI Agents”

May 22, 2025
Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve the House Tax Bill

Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve the House Tax Bill

May 22, 2025
SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

May 22, 2025

Recent News

Regime Uncertainty and the Trump New Deal

May 22, 2025

“Certified Software from Cognigy Empowers Azure Customers as Microsoft Solutions Partner, Introducing Agentic Enterprise AI Agents”

May 22, 2025
Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve the House Tax Bill

Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve the House Tax Bill

May 22, 2025
SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

May 22, 2025

Disclaimer: SuccessAmericanInvestors.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 SuccessAmericanInvestors. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock

Copyright © 2025 SuccessAmericanInvestors. All Rights Reserved.