No Result
View All Result
Success American Investors
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Success American Investors
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Depicting K-12 Productivity, Continued

by
April 14, 2025
in Editor's Pick
0
Depicting K-12 Productivity, Continued
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Neal McCluskey

Last month I wrote about creating an updated K‑12 productivity chart. The difficulty of any chart is balancing ease of understanding with accuracy and nuance, and that applies here.

A major concern with the trial chart I produced was complication. It was not intuitive, especially using outcomes of high school seniors surpassing certain performance benchmarks. The goal was to have roughly comparable spending and outcome measures—percentage change in spending versus percentage point change in student performance. The primary source of confusion is that the “main” National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) exam, which was added to extend the performance trend from 2012 to 2019, has a “proficiency” benchmark, but the long-term trend (LTT) exam does not. 

I used the change in the percent of students scoring “proficient” or above to demonstrate progress on the main NAEP, and passing the middle cut-score on the NAEP reporting table for the LTT. But that score could seem arbitrary (also, it is actually the second-highest cut-score overall). The NAEP does have descriptions of the benchmarks, but those would be difficult to explain on the chart.

A simpler version of that chart can be seen next, still using students surpassing cut scores, but with spending and scores compared to a base year, which varies for each trend because some tests were first administered later or earlier than others.

To remedy the benchmark problem, next is essentially the original productivity chart that ended in 2012, except rather than using inflation-adjusted total funding for a high school senior’s K‑12 career, it plots percentage change in NAEP scale scores against percentage change in inflation-adjusted per-pupil spending, and adds main NAEP scores to extend the trend to 2019. 

The problem is that a percentage change in a scale score has indeterminate meaning; a small percentage change could indicate small or large learning increases. That said, as a rule of thumb, a year of learning is equal to about 10 scale score points. This is itself controversial, but using it, the 6‑point scale-score increase from the baseline of 300 on LTT math is a 2 percent rise between the first administration in 1978 and the last in 2012, suggesting 17-year-olds had 3.6 more months’ worth of learning in the last year versus the first, assuming a 180-day school year. 

Was that a good return coinciding with a 76 percent increase in inflation-adjusted per-pupil spending—from $8,879 to $15,588? That’s a judgment call.

While the ways of presenting the productivity evidence have meaningful differences, the ultimate story seems to be the same. For high school seniors—essentially our education system’s “final” products”—outcomes in reading have been stagnant or falling. In math, they rose until 2012 but largely stagnated after, while spending has ballooned.

Of course, as bears constant repeating, NAEP—and standardized testing generally—likely does not capture nearly all that people think education should be about. Meanwhile, numerous variables impact NAEP scores beyond spending, which is one reason a version of the chart (see below) includes a line for changing GDP; other things equal, an increase in material well-being should foster an increase in academic outcomes.

In the end, life is complicated, so any chart should be taken as just one piece of evidence in analyzing broad educational outcomes.

Previous Post

The Power of the Advisor/Advisee Relationship

Next Post

New Poll: Americans Want Congress to Pair Tax Cuts with Spending Cuts

Next Post
New Poll: Americans Want Congress to Pair Tax Cuts with Spending Cuts

New Poll: Americans Want Congress to Pair Tax Cuts with Spending Cuts

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Vertica: The new Israeli start-up challenger to Viagra proving ‘life-changing’ for men with ED

Vertica: The new Israeli start-up challenger to Viagra proving ‘life-changing’ for men with ED

February 14, 2024
Idaho Bucks Managed Care Trend

Idaho Bucks Managed Care Trend

December 5, 2023

The Producer Price Index

September 9, 2023

CMKE Introduces PPM Subscription Model to Drive Cost Savings for Scottish Businesses

November 9, 2023
Bank of England governor urges UK to rebuild EU trade ties as key summit looms

Bank of England governor urges UK to rebuild EU trade ties as key summit looms

0

0

0

0
Bank of England governor urges UK to rebuild EU trade ties as key summit looms

Bank of England governor urges UK to rebuild EU trade ties as key summit looms

May 9, 2025
The Power of No: Why, When and How to Say It

The Power of No: Why, When and How to Say It

May 9, 2025

Building a SaaS Marketing Strategy That Scales Without Burning Through Your Budget

May 9, 2025
US trade deal is not a win for UK automotive industry

US trade deal is not a win for UK automotive industry

May 9, 2025

Recent News

Bank of England governor urges UK to rebuild EU trade ties as key summit looms

Bank of England governor urges UK to rebuild EU trade ties as key summit looms

May 9, 2025
The Power of No: Why, When and How to Say It

The Power of No: Why, When and How to Say It

May 9, 2025

Building a SaaS Marketing Strategy That Scales Without Burning Through Your Budget

May 9, 2025
US trade deal is not a win for UK automotive industry

US trade deal is not a win for UK automotive industry

May 9, 2025

Disclaimer: SuccessAmericanInvestors.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 SuccessAmericanInvestors. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock

Copyright © 2025 SuccessAmericanInvestors. All Rights Reserved.